We are in difficult times where we have to generate a strong move to make us respect. It has triggered a strong political-party campaign by 2014. Vazquez first in his role as ruler hysterical first says no, then says he misses being president ... then P. Bordaberry coupled with signatures is not to seek accession to the presidency ... after Lacalle KUKI Bordaberry joins in order to retain the Conservatives before the onslaught of Larrañaga to capture the "moderates" ... Now departmental governments, the result of popular clamor, even the FA, are declaring their support for the signatures gathered from the survey because their populations say most support and wants to get this result.
BPS elections, which was bizarre, cost millions of dollars, which could have been intended for the vulnerable resources. The millions spent on political campaigning, as the price they paid to the parties by voting, it could also be used to continue to create decent jobs or increases in low-paying jobs ... Housing, health, all those things that are forgotten by the people who live on that and increase their coffers with that.
Excessive state bureaucracy does not provide access to resources in a timely manner ... sometimes projects working with families in extreme poverty calls for beds and mattresses they sleep on the floor 11, and if you do give them at least 6 months. Alienated workers are employed in direct care to vulnerable populations, there is no effective tools to support children and adolescents. Needed human and material resources to build a bridge between social and margin territory in which they are for three generations in most cases. What for? So they can decide themselves what they can exercise power in society ... We know that those in the margin or with one foot out the power to be exercised in conflict with the law because they want what many have, that is the possibility of being subject consumers.
Why rob a teenager? Because he wants something he has not. Why should we lower internet movies (piracy)? Because we want to see something that is not available. If we reflect these two questions and responses, the equivalent is that both examples are in conflict with the law. In the case of the murders, no research has been done about it, but many of us have a hypothesis, to have street, talk to these teenagers, and other things, that a high percentage of reckoning. The reckoning is as follows: for debts of substance, because the abuse or violation killed a family member involved in the crime, gang trouble, and obviously also in the plunder ... But everything is put in the same bag as problematic , and the statistics say we have evidence latinoametica lowest murder of teenagers.
What magnifies this problem is the perception or feeling of insecurity, which often arises from those who have much and are unwilling to give up anything for anyone but themselves. These are the neighbors ... neighbor who prefer a complaint to the police or whistle at the sensation fear ... those more than call the police must call a psychiatrist, psychologists quiarta to address their problems ... and channel them.
is time to create decent policies to combat inequality. We can not continue arguing that the media will devote half of the comedy and realistic programming and violent scrap and the other half to the news "yellow." It is very foolish to think that the Xo equity ... we will generate millions of dollars were spent and the tool is not real and can be useful to education. Put computers in schools and colleges for all. The classrooms are overcrowded and when a child a victim of that and embodies the institutional chaos, given Ritalin or is sent to a school space that will be expelled.
Proposals to improve this are many, but we ask little of us in this. Instead of coming to ask those who work in direct care, you ask people who have no idea beyond what the media say that the majority of cases that speech is completely maimed benefit of media moguls run.
is time to build a strong campaign to first generate an offensive to defend all children and adolescents based on the Convention of the Rights of the Child signed by Uruguay and hundreds of countries. But bring up that the proposal is to make structural changes to be a society worth living in it. All good with Nacional and Peñarol, with the Uruguayan team, with the increase of GDP, with the biggest records of flags, large roasts, all that crap media that covers the misery of knowing that "fascism" discursive moves masses.
This article is written from the "we" because there is nobody but a collective agency that is developing that is already imposed for seeking to improve as a society. To summarize and propose the if not that in our view are important to take it proclaims in this situation is happening in our country.
A we say NO
Recorded background not to those under 18!
No to lowering the age of accountability!
not a violation of the rights of children and teens!
not increased resources for police repression!
do not want more perverse forms involving children and adolescents in the campaigns policies!
No more "fighting poverty"!
A we say YES
If the protection of children and adolescents with effective measures, with decent budget and people who are educated and really want to work with!
If innovative proposals that seek strategies for decent social inclusion of children and teenagers!
If respect for international treaties to which they adhere, in this matter as in all matters concerning human rights!
If the increase in resources for education: the creation of new schools and colleges, the improvement of the University of the Republic, to all children and adolescents have the necessary resources to study, better teacher training and better wages to prevent multi-employment to survive!
If the battle for wealth, the wealth that is the owner of the media, the means of production, those many anonymous influencing public opinion and try to hold him who has none, which consuming and not annoying the consumer!
Signature: Of many who believe in the dignity and social equity.
0 comments:
Post a Comment